Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://locus.ufv.br//handle/123456789/23869
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorAssis, Tamires Condé de
dc.contributor.authorCalijuri, Maria Lúcia
dc.contributor.authorAssemany, Paula Peixoto
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Alexia Saleme Aona de Paula
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Márcio Arêdes
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-12T13:59:15Z
dc.date.available2019-03-12T13:59:15Z
dc.date.issued2019-04
dc.identifier.issn0959-6526
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.093
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/23869
dc.description.abstractThis study approached the use of atmospheric emissions as a source of carbon for the cultivation of microalgae in high rate ponds (HRPs), continuously fed with domestic sewage pre-treated in a septic tank. To do so, two HRPs were used: one had CO2 at a concentration of 99.9% (HRP 1), and the other had gas from the combustion of gasoline (HRP 2). Biomass yield, sewage treatment efficiency and the economic viability of using these two sources were assessed. The results showed that the CO2 source did not influence the domestic sewage treatment or the yield and biochemical composition of biomass, since there was no statistical difference (p < 0.05) between the values measured for both ponds. The mean yield values were 6.00 and 6.12 g m−2 day−1, respectively for the HRPs 1 and 2. As for the mean concentrations of ammonia nitrogen and the percentages of removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD), they were in the average for both HRPs (26.4 mg L−1 and 31.2%). The negative Net Present Values (NPV) showed that in this study the investments for installing external CO2 sources are not economically viable for any of the two studied sources, when the biomass produced in the HRPs is used for the production of biofuels and as source of protein for animal feeding. The initial investments, allied to the prices of the biomass, were the factors that mostly influenced the economic analysis, contributing to the lack of attractiveness in this scale. Despite this, the use of atmospheric emissions along with domestic sewage as a cultivation medium means the biomass produced in this study has less environmental impact when compared to similar biomasses.en
dc.formatpdfpt-BR
dc.language.isoengpt-BR
dc.publisherJournal of Cleaner Productionpt-BR
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVolume 215, 1 April 2019, Pages 1160-1169pt-BR
dc.rightsElsevier B. V.pt-BR
dc.subjectInvestment analysispt-BR
dc.subjectHigh rate pondspt-BR
dc.subjectCO2 supplypt-BR
dc.subjectEffluent treatmentpt-BR
dc.titleUsing atmospheric emissions as CO2 source in the cultivation of microalgae: Productivity and economic viabilityen
dc.typeArtigopt-BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
artigo.pdf
  Until 2100-12-31
Texto completo1,76 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir ACESSO RESTRITO


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.